Associatieve Samenwerking

Two independent groups work together

The method of cooperation is laid down in protocols that are developed and adjusted mutually if necessary. Two rules are strong advised:
(1) Content creators may not use the software for commercial activities. Those are the rules of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This will need further clarification.
(2) Content creators retain ownership of the data they produce and manage.

This is a basic idea but there are still some 'loose ends' to be discussed. The thorny issue is the revenue model. In principle, the toolmakers' 'creative commons' software can be used for free by the content creators. Also content reviewing has to be established. What review system do the content creators use. Peer review is an option. Quality must be guaranteed in all cases.

(1) Toolmakers may have income from all kinds of services they provide. Training. Front editing of the school website on which the application runs. Additional graphic design of the embedded images. Development of additional modules. For example, creating a rough version of a graph based on text. Anlysis of text is limited to causality and/or sequential action. Might be doable with e.g. neural net techniques (DL) and logical language analysis, not LLM, as that is really still unaffordable.

(2) Content creators will have to rely on subsidies. For that, I am not only looking at the Flemish government. The education umbrellas too, perhaps? The FWO? But also the EU, for example. It can become a project of international cooperation. I think there are certainly institutes that are open to it.